Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2/7/1995

Parker v. State

Citations

337 Md. 271
653 A.2d 436
1995 Md. LEXIS 17

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that “[t]he common law principle of absolute judicial immunity for judicial acts has neither been abrogated nor been modified in Maryland” (emphasis added)
holding that \[t]he common law principle of absolute judicial immunity for judicial acts has neither been abrogated nor been modified in Maryland\ (emphasis added)
holding that \[t]he qualified immunity of a public official does not necessarily protect a government employer sued on a theory of respondeat superior \
holding that “[t]he qualified immunity of a public official does not necessarily protect a government employer sued on a theory of respondeat superior ”
holding that a judge issuing an arrest warrant was performing a judicial act and was entitled to absolute judicial immunity from civil liability
recognizing that judicial immunity is broader than public official immunity in that the former immunizes officials from civil liability for violations of the Maryland Constitution and for intentional torts in addition to other state-law causes of action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eldridge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.