State v. Harris

Citations

• 2023 Ohio 648

Syllabus

After merging multiple offenses and specifications, appellant was convicted of two counts of murder with firearm specifications, aggravated burglary, and having weapons while under disability. Appellant's statutory and constitutional speedy trial rights were not violated. His convictions were based on sufficient evidence and not against the manifest weight of the evidence. The trial court did not err in admitting two short surveillance videos from the scene or in denying appellant's subsequent motion for a mistrial. The trial court's judgment entry did not accurately reflect the aggregate sentence orally imposed. Judgment affirmed, but the trial court is ordered to file a nunc pro tunc entry correcting the judgment entry.