Ohio Court of Appeals· 2/13/2026

State v. Harris

Citations

2026 Ohio 486

Syllabus

The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellant's untimely motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence. Appellant failed to seek leave to file his untimely motion and did not show that he was unavoidably prevented from filing a timely motion for a new trial or discovering the new evidence. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Epley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

State v. Perry
Ohio Supreme Court· 1967-05-03· cited 2,571×
State v. Harris
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-03-03· cited 15×
State v. Warren
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-03-10· cited 11×
State v. McAlpin
Ohio Supreme Court· 2026-01-21· cited 10×
State v. Moody
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-03-08· cited 6×
State v. Bostick
Ohio Supreme Court· 2025-12-16· cited 4×
Prestige Fin. Servs., Inc. v. Baldwin
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-04-18· cited 3×
State v. Wells
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-08-08· cited 1×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.