Skip to main content

State v. Ruggles

Citations

  • 2024 Ohio 3128

Syllabus

The trial court did not err by overruling appellant's motion dismiss the complaint charging her with five counts of contributing to the unruliness of a child the complaint contained all the essential elements of the charged offense. Appellant's convictions for contributing to the unruliness of a child were supported by sufficient evidence and were not against the manifest weight of the evidence. The trial court did not abuse its discretion by prohibiting certain testimony concerning appellants' niece, because such testimony was irrelevant and could have confused the jury. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Webaum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.