Ohio Supreme Court· 12/16/2025

State v. Bostick

Citations

2025 Ohio 5559

Syllabus

Criminal law—Crim.R. 33(A)(6) requires that a trial court conduct an evidentiary hearing on a motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence, but it does not require that the hearing be a formal, oral hearing—Court of appeals' judgment affirmed.

Judges: Deters, J.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

State v. Harris
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2026-02-13
State v. Sharpe
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2026-04-03
State v. Birt
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2026-06-15
Morgan v. Jones
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2026-06-26

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Neil v. Biggers
Supreme Court· 1972-12-06· cited 7,056×
State v. Adams
Ohio Supreme Court· 1980-05-07· cited 3,804×
Harris v. Nelson
Supreme Court· 1969-05-05· cited 955×
District Attorney's Office for the Third Judicial District v. Osborne
Supreme Court· 2009-06-18· cited 782×
State v. Phillips
Ohio Supreme Court· 1995-11-22· cited 140×
State v. Hatton
Ohio Supreme Court· 2022-11-10· cited 113×
Gutierrez v. Saenz
Supreme Court· 2025-06-26· cited 26×
State v. Miller
Ohio Supreme Court· 2023-09-28· cited 19×
State v. Wilcox
Ohio Supreme Court· 2024-12-10· cited 7×
State v. Bostick
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-10-05· cited 1×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.