Washington Supreme Court· 2/10/1983

State v. Pam

Citations

659 P.2d 454
98 Wash. 2d 748
1983 Wash. LEXIS 1382

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that, to enhance a punishment, a defendant must be armed with a deadly weapon in fact
affirming defendant's convictions but setting aside jury's special verdict that defendant was armed with a deadly weapon because trial court erred in instructing jury in special verdict forms
affirming defendant’s convictions but setting aside jury’s special verdict that defendant was armed with a deadly weapon because trial court erred in instructing jury in special verdict forms
rule that defendant's statement waives privilege against self-incrimination regarding related matters applies only where statement put before trier of fact
rule that defendant's statement waives privilege against self-incrimination regarding related matters applies only where statement put before trier of fact
prejudice arising from introduction of prior convictions which are similar to the charged crime is great since the jury is likely to believe \if he did it before he probably did so this time\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dore, Utter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

62 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.