Washington Supreme Court· 8/15/2002
State v. Oster
Citations
- 147 Wash. 2d 141
- 52 P.3d 26
- 2002 Wash. LEXIS 520
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding the State must prove each essential element of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt
- Apprendi does not apply where the fact of the prior convictions for violation of no-contact orders was found by the jury beyond a reasonable doubt
- Apprendi does not apply where the fact of the prior convictions for violation of no-contact orders was found by the jury beyond a reasonable doubt
- trial court did not abuse discretion by bifurcating instructions to require separate consideration of a prejudicial element
- noting the generally \prejudicial effect of prior convictions\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Chambers
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. MillsWashington Supreme Court· 2005-04-07· cited 148×
- State v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2012-06-04· cited 75×
- State v. RoswellWashington Supreme Court· 2008-12-04· cited 69×
- State v. OsterWashington Supreme Court· 2002-08-15· cited 56×
- State v. TealCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2003-07-28· cited 27×
- State v. CarmenCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2003-10-06· cited 24×
- State v. ChambersCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2010-08-16· cited 22×
- State v. CaseWashington Supreme Court· 2016-12-08· cited 20×
- State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2003-03-10· cited 19×
- State v. LANGSTEADCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2010-04-12· cited 19×
- In Re Personal Restraint of HallWashington Supreme Court· 2008-04-03· cited 16×
- In re the Personal Restraint of HallWashington Supreme Court· 2008-04-03· cited 16×
- United States v. CarrNinth Circuit· 2008-01-25· cited 13×
- State v. FranceCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2004-04-27· cited 12×
- State v. MillsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2003-03-10· cited 11×
- State v. MullenCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2015-03-10· cited 10×
- State v. BacheCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2008-10-07· cited 8×
- State Of Washington v. Artur TysyachukCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2020-04-14· cited 6×
- State v. ChambersCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2010-08-10· cited 4×
- State v. DraxingerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2008-12-23· cited 4×
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court· 1970-05-18· cited 11,712×
- Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court· 1975-06-09· cited 3,396×
- State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court· 1997-02-06· cited 195×
- State v. EmmanuelWashington Supreme Court· 1953-07-02· cited 129×
- State v. JonesWashington Supreme Court· 1984-02-09· cited 101×
- State v. EastmondWashington Supreme Court· 1996-07-18· cited 86×
- State v. HardyWashington Supreme Court· 1997-11-20· cited 66×
- State v. CalegarWashington Supreme Court· 1997-11-20· cited 22×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.