Court of Appeals of Iowa· 9/6/2007

State v. Hall

Citations

740 N.W.2d 200
2007 Iowa App. LEXIS 939
2007 WL 2492446

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding restriction on defendant’s communication with any child under eighteen years of age with no exception for incidental communication was unreasonably restrictive
ruling condition of probation that prohibited contact with minors was not unreasonable “because the restriction contain[ed] an exception for ‘incidental contact in public places where other responsible adults are present’ ”
finding a challenge to a no-contact order, raised for the first time on appeal, was not waived and should be treated as a challenge to an illegal sentence
considering a constitutional challenge to no-contact order included in the defendant’s sentence over the state’s argument that the issue was not preserved because it was not presented in district court
considering a constitutional challenge to no-contact order included in the defendant’s sentence over the state’s argument that the issue was not preserved because it was not presented in district court
noting a party “may not allege error on an issue to which he acquiesced”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baker, Huitink, Vogel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.