United States v. Ronald Scott Paul

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that condition requiring defendant to avoid places, establishments, and areas frequented by minors was neither vague nor overbroad
• concluding that a computer ban was reasonably related to a non-production child pornography offense, and the need to prevent recidivism and protect the public
• holding that condition requiring appellant to “avoid ‘direct and indirect contact with minors’” was not “unduly broad”
• concluding that a condition of supervised release limiting access to “places, establishments, and areas frequented by minors” was not im-permissibly vague
• holding that condition requiring appellant to “avoid ‘direct and indirect contact with minors’” was not “unduly broad”
• holding that if the defendant’s “primary means of supporting himself” were involved, then he would be entitled to the higher level of scrutiny for occupational restrictions under § 5F1.5

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).