· 8/28/1987
United States v. Gallo
Citations
- 668 F. Supp. 736
- 56 U.S.L.W. 2230
- 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8867
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- suggesting jury could not heed the “extraordinarily intricate limiting instructions” of mega-trial without aid of a computer
- “[T]he prejudices to the defendants are not clearly dispositive ..., we might be reluctant to grant such severances on Rule 14 alone.... [W]e question the traditional assumption that denial of severance ... promotes efficiency.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Weinstein
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.