State v. Muhlenbruch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the language of the statute, which criminalized the possession of a computer or other visual or print medium, provided the unit of prosecution as each computer and not the individual images within the computer
• “Any recasting of the scope of criminal liability ... is the province of the legislature, not this court.”
• “Any recasting of the scope of criminal liability . . . is the province of the legislature, not this court.”
• “[T]his court has recognized that strict construction of criminal statutes should be applied in cases where there is doubt regarding the allowable unit of prosecution.”
• “[T]his court has recognized that strict construction of criminal statutes should be applied in cases where there is doubt regarding the allowable unit of prosecution.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).