State v. Hall

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “all that is necessary” is that the object serves to revive the witness’s recollection

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Milke v. Ryan
  Ninth Circuit· 2013-03-14· cited 99×
• State v. Clifton
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1982-10-12· cited 24×
• State v. Rhodes
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1975-12-17· cited 18×

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Chapman v. California
  Supreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
• Griffin v. California
  Supreme Court· 1965-04-28· cited 4,680×
• Griffin v. California
  Supreme Court· 1965-06-07· cited 4,088×
• California v. Green
  Supreme Court· 1970-06-23· cited 3,363×
• Marvin Lustiger v. United States
  Ninth Circuit· 1968-03-04· cited 76×
• Kinsey v. State of Arizona
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1937-03-08· cited 67×
• State v. McKinney
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1972-09-28· cited 66×
• State v. Maloney
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1970-01-27· cited 55×
• State v. Dixon
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1971-10-05· cited 37×
• State v. Schmid
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1971-04-28· cited 21×
• State v. Turner
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1969-06-11· cited 19×
• State v. Riley
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1970-10-28· cited 11×
• State v. Hall
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1970-05-05· cited 7×
• State v. Sayre
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1972-01-07· cited 6×