Arizona Supreme Court· 1/27/1970

State v. Maloney

Citations

464 P.2d 793
105 Ariz. 348
1970 Ariz. LEXIS 266

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

upholding capital punishment under article 2, section 15 while recognizing that societal status of that penalty was “in turmoil,” with “a plethora of arguments pro and con on the question”
\newly announced principle of double jeopardy” applied to \those cases on direct appeal on the date this decision is rendered\ but not \to cases finalized prior thereto”
“It is settled law that any one penalty does not abridge the rights of a person under the Equal Protection Clause so long as no one person is subject to any different or greater punishment than others of the same class.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lockwood, Struckmeyer, Udall, McFarland, Jack, Hays, Wren

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

41 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Maloney

35 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.