Arizona Supreme Court· 9/28/1972

State v. McKinney

Citations

501 P.2d 378
108 Ariz. 436
1972 Ariz. LEXIS 358

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

Entrapment is an affirmative defense; however, once the issue is raised by the defendant, the State has the burden of proof.
a defendant who wishes to utilize the entrapment defense must admit substantial elements of the crime and one who denies knowledge of the crime may not raise the entrapment defense
a defendant who wishes to utilize the entrapment defense must admit substantial elements of the crime and one who denies knowledge of the crime may not raise the entrapment defense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cameron, Struckmeyer, Holohan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

46 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.