Arizona Supreme Court· 10/31/1983

State v. Haas

Citations

675 P.2d 673
138 Ariz. 413
1983 Ariz. LEXIS 273

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

adding that requisite knowledge can exist if a defendant acts with “a conscious purpose to avoid learning the true contents” of the vehicle
discussing statutory elements of fraudulent schemes and artifices and their definitions under a prior version of the statute
discussing the elements and definitions of a prior version of the statute
describing statutory elements under an earlier version of the fraud statute
even if particular instruction misleading, other statements made by judge cured problem

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Feldman, Holohan, Gordon, Hays, Cameron

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.