Court of Appeals of Arizona· 8/3/1995
State v. Cook
Citations
- 916 P.2d 1074
- 185 Ariz. 358
- 196 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 17
- 1995 Ariz. App. LEXIS 171
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- offense requiring proof that defendant obtained a benefit differs from offense that does not include such requirement
- statute prohibiting scheme or artifice involving securities transaction differs from statute generally applicable to scheme or artifice for financial gain
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ehrlich, Kleinschmidt, Contreras
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. EagleArizona Supreme Court· 2000-02-23· cited 55×
- State v. SiddleCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2002-07-17· cited 51×
- Lemke v. RayesCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2006-08-15· cited 44×
- State v. WelchCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2000-11-17· cited 27×
- In Re Jeremiah T.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2006-01-09· cited 22×
- State v. EagleCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1998-03-26· cited 19×
- Stevenson v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-05-03· cited 17×
- State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2004-01-16· cited 16×
- In Re Jerry C.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2007-01-25· cited 8×
- Marzolf v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1995-11-21· cited 6×
- State v. BraunCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1995-11-30· cited 4×
- Jardanowski v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZONACourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2000-02-08· cited 3×
- State of Arizona v. Janice L. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2004-01-16
- Dennis Brodsky v. State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2008-04-18
- State v. RedzinakCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2018-05-22
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1931-12-11· cited 10,676×
- United States v. DixonSupreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 2,221×
- United States v. HalperSupreme Court· 1989-05-15· cited 1,945×
- Grady v. CorbinSupreme Court· 1990-05-29· cited 1,620×
- McNally v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1987-06-24· cited 1,314×
- Illinois v. VitaleSupreme Court· 1980-06-19· cited 1,215×
- Pool v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court· 1984-01-04· cited 270×
- State v. GordonArizona Supreme Court· 1989-07-18· cited 105×
- People v. BelcherCalifornia Supreme Court· 1974-03-28· cited 80×
- Freeport-McMoRan Inc. v. K N Energy, Inc.Supreme Court· 1992-02-24· cited 70×
- State v. TinghitellaArizona Supreme Court· 1971-12-17· cited 69×
- State v. NunezArizona Supreme Court· 1991-02-21· cited 54×
- State v. HaasArizona Supreme Court· 1983-10-31· cited 49×
- State v. CassiusArizona Supreme Court· 1974-04-16· cited 38×
- Taylor v. SherrillArizona Supreme Court· 1991-10-24· cited 34×
- State v. SuarezCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1983-07-19· cited 24×
- State v. SheavesCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1987-12-24· cited 22×
- Mullet v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1991-03-19· cited 16×
- Hernandez v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1994-05-19· cited 12×
- State v. EverhartCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1991-06-27· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.