Skip to main content

State v. Cook

Citations

  • 916 P.2d 1074
  • 185 Ariz. 358
  • 196 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 17
  • 1995 Ariz. App. LEXIS 171

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • offense requiring proof that defendant obtained a benefit differs from offense that does not include such requirement
  • statute prohibiting scheme or artifice involving securities transaction differs from statute generally applicable to scheme or artifice for financial gain

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ehrlich, Kleinschmidt, Contreras

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.