Skip to main content
· 9/26/1983

Brown v. Superior Court in & for Maricopa Cy.

Citations

  • 670 P.2d 725
  • 137 Ariz. 327
  • 1983 Ariz. LEXIS 235

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “No matter how the test is defined, bad faith is a question of reasonableness under the circumstances.”
  • in camera inspection of insurance files purportedly containing irrelevant and privileged materials was best way to determine questions of relevancy and discoverability
  • in action alleging bad faith, insured’s “need for the information in the [claims] file is not only substantial, but overwhelming”
  • “No matter how the test is defined, bad faith is a question of reasonableness under the circumstances.”
  • tort of bad faith arises “when an insurance company intentionally denies, fails to process, or fails to pay a claim without a reasonable basis for such action”
  • relevancy requirement at discovery stage “more loosely construed than that required at trial” and need only be “reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Feldman, Holohan, Gordon, Hays, Cameron

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.