Skip to main content

State v. Haas

Citations

  • 2025 Ohio 683

Syllabus

Per Mayle, J., trial court did not err in joining two cases for trial because evidence was simple and direct. Convictions were not against the manifest weight of evidence. Trial counsel was not ineffective because alleged errors did not effect outcome of trial. Sixth Amendment right to counsel was not violated by denial of counsel's motion to withdraw. Trial court did not abuse its discretion in imposing maximum sentences because there is no evidence that trial court considered improper factors.

Judges: Mayle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.