State v. Johnson

Citations

• 2019 Ohio 4613

Syllabus

Appellant invited any error related to his no-contest plea because he consented to a finding of guilt. Appellant did not set forth facts showing that a manifest injustice had occurred, so trial court was not required to hold a hearing before denying the motion to withdraw plea. Appellant did not show that he was prejudiced by trial counsel's alleged ineffectiveness. Trial court specified consecutive sentences at sentencing hearing and in sentencing entry, so there was no ambiguity in the sentence.