Skip to main content

State v. Messer

Citations

  • 2017 Ohio 1223

Syllabus

A defendant who fails to renew his Crim.R. 29 motion for acquittal at the close of all the evidence does not waive consideration of the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his conviction on appeal, and such challenges should be reviewed under a prejudicial-error standard. Appellant's conviction was based on sufficient evidence and was not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Mayle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.