Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 3/4/1996
State v. Gulledge
Citations
- 468 S.E.2d 665
- 321 S.C. 399
- 1996 S.C. App. LEXIS 37
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- suggesting there may be a distinction in the treatment of a request for information under Rule 5(a) and a request under Brady, where the information is in the hands of a third party
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Goolsby, Howell, Hearn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- Noisette v. IsmailSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-04-01· cited 164×
- State v. FranklinSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1976-07-21· cited 40×
- United States v. WortmanE.D. Illinois· 1960-10-27· cited 27×
- Adamson v. Marianne Fabrics, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1990-04-16· cited 18×
- Schofield v. Richland County School DistrictSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1994-07-05· cited 15×
- State v. CantrellSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1967-11-30· cited 14×
- State v. WoodruffSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-12-11· cited 11×
- State v. GeeSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1974-04-24· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.