Skip to main content

State v. Guido

Citations

  • 698 A.2d 729
  • 1997 R.I. LEXIS 252
  • 1997 WL 434387

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a patient had no legitimate expectation of privacy in his medical records kept at hospital
  • holding that a patient had no legitimate expectation of privacy in his medical records kept at hospital
  • discussing the grand jury’s “interrelated but distinct functions” of investigation and indicting
  • discussing the grand jury’s “interrelated but distinct functions” of investigation and indicting
  • recognizing “the subpoena power of the judiciary”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Weisberger, Lederberg, Bourcier, Flanders, Goldberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.