Skip to main content
· 7/1/2009

Langley v. Providence College

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding a state law similar to the TCPA is constitutional post-Reed
  • upholding state statute as valid content-neutral time, place, and manner speech restriction and confirming the “legitimacy” of the state’s interest in preventing unwanted calls
  • upholding state statute as valid content-neutral time, place, and manner speech restriction and confirming the “legitimacy” of the state’s interest in preventing unwanted calls
  • upholding state statute as valid content-neutral time, place, and manner speech restriction and confirming the “legitimacy” of the state’s interest in preventing unwanted calls
  • upholding state statute as valid content-neutral time, place, and manner speech restriction and confirming the “legitimacy” of the state’s interest in preventing unwanted calls
  • upholding state statute as valid content-neutral time, place, and manner speech restriction and confirming the “legitimacy” of the state’s interest in preventing unwanted calls

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: HURST, J.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.