· 7/1/2009
Langley v. Providence College
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding a state law similar to the TCPA is constitutional post-Reed
- upholding state statute as valid content-neutral time, place, and manner speech restriction and confirming the “legitimacy” of the state’s interest in preventing unwanted calls
- upholding state statute as valid content-neutral time, place, and manner speech restriction and confirming the “legitimacy” of the state’s interest in preventing unwanted calls
- upholding state statute as valid content-neutral time, place, and manner speech restriction and confirming the “legitimacy” of the state’s interest in preventing unwanted calls
- upholding state statute as valid content-neutral time, place, and manner speech restriction and confirming the “legitimacy” of the state’s interest in preventing unwanted calls
- upholding state statute as valid content-neutral time, place, and manner speech restriction and confirming the “legitimacy” of the state’s interest in preventing unwanted calls
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: HURST, J.
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.