Skip to main content

State v. Bertram

Citations

  • 591 A.2d 14
  • 1991 R.I. LEXIS 79
  • 1991 WL 74598

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “photographs may be admitted for a number of - relevant purposes including * * * serving as proof of the corpus delec-tó [sic], displaying the extent of the victim’s injuries, identifying the body and its condition, or bearing on the atrociousness of the crime”
  • declining the defendant’s invitation to follow the path of other jurisdictions that liberally construe the self-incrimination provisions to provide for greater protections
  • declining the defendant's invitation to follow the path of other jurisdictions that liberally construe the self-incrimination provisions to provide for greater protections
  • finding defendant had no legitimate expectation of privacy as a passenger in a car leased by his wife in her own name
  • defense counsel “had ample opportunity to cross-examine [the handwriting expert] on his conclusions and emphasize any infirmities pertaining to his analysis” of the disputed documents, and the jury was free to “decide what weight, if any, should be accorded to the testimony”
  • discussing state and federal right against self-incrimination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kelleher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

41 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

54 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.