Court of Appeals of Oregon· 5/16/2018
State v. Guffey
Citations
- 422 P.3d 293
- 291 Or. App. 729
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- court did not err in refusing to review school records in camera where defendant did not make a threshold showing that the records contained qual- itatively different information than what defendant already possessed
- a threshold showing of materiality for DHS records was not made under the defendant’s theory, where the defen- dant failed to show how they could be used to cross-examine the witness or were otherwise relevant to the theory of the defense
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Armstrong, Egan, Shorr
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court· 1985-07-02· cited 8,539×
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court· 1995-04-19· cited 6,003×
- State v. ZinsliCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-09-30· cited 27×
- State v. BrayCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-10-12· cited 15×
- Tiner v. PremoCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-03-01· cited 12×
- State v. OhottoCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-02-12· cited 10×
- State v. LammiColumbia County Circuit Court· 2016-09-14· cited 6×
- State v. LammiCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-09-14· cited 6×
- State v. CovingtonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-05-02· cited 3×
- State v. SpadaCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1978-03-20· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.