State v. Zinsli

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that, to determine “whether evidence is material and favorable, the compulsory process analysis is identical to the due process analysis”
• explaining that Oregon’s compulsory process analysis “is identical to” the federal due process analysis
• explaining that Oregon’s compulsory process analysis “is identical to” the federal due process analysis
• as to “whether evidence is material and favorable, the compulsory process analysis is identical to the due process analysis”
• “[The video]’s replay would have given defendant a unique opportunity to per- mit the jurors to form their own opinions as to defendant’s intoxication level.”
• “[The video]’s replay would have given defendant a unique opportunity to per- mit the jurors to form their own opinions as to defendant’s intoxication level.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).