Skip to main content

State v. Lammi

Citations

  • 281 Or. App. 96
  • 380 P.3d 1257
  • 2016 Ore. App. LEXIS 1078

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • allowing in camera review of counselling records to determine whether they fell within an exception to statutory confidentiality requirement
  • burden on party seeking in camera review to make a threshold showing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hadlock, Lagesen, Sercombe

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.