Skip to main content
· 3/10/1995

In Re Tax Appeal of Collingwood Grain, Inc.

Citations

  • 257 Kan. 237
  • 891 P.2d 422
  • 1995 Kan. LEXIS 37

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding electricity used by a grain elevator in blending, cleaning, drying, and aerating grain was exempt from sales tax because the electricity improved the grain quality—a benefit passed to the consumer
  • finding it was undisputed that electricity is “tangible personal property” subject to the sales tax exemption pursuant to K.S.A. 79-3602[m][B]
  • abuse of discretion standard applied in reviewing motion to quash an administrative subpoena
  • order certifying class action reviewable once agency issued order addressing merits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Abbott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.