Skip to main content

State v. Garza

Citations

  • 295 Kan. 326
  • 286 P.3d 554
  • 2012 WL 4801328
  • 2012 Kan. LEXIS 456

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • the equivalents of RCW 46.61.100, not RCW 46.61.140, applied when vehicle crossed into a left-of-center lane even though the center line was not visible
  • the equivalents of RCW 46.61.100, not RCW 46.61.140 applied, when vehicle crossed into a left-of-center lane even though the centerline was not visible
  • not the function of appellate court to serve as a finder of fact
  • “an appellate court only obtains jurisdiction over the ruling identified in the appeal”
  • an appellate court does not serve as a finder of fact

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Biles, Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.