Skip to main content

State v. King

Citations

  • 274 P.3d 599
  • 293 Kan. 1057
  • 2012 WL 753119
  • 2012 Kan. LEXIS 158

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • proffered testimony of defense witnesses tending to establish bias, interest, improper motives of arresting officer admissible as integral part of defense
  • front porch partially screened, easily seen through, unlocked, provided access to front door, and anyone could see or hear persons on porch
  • evidence integral to defendant’s theory of self-defense essential for a fair trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rosen, J.:

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.