Supreme Court of Kansas· 1/30/1998
State v. Lewis
Citations
- 953 P.2d 1016
- 263 Kan. 843
- 1998 Kan. LEXIS 22
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that statutory notice provisions requiring notice be sent by first-class mail “comport with notice requirements of the Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution”
- driving while a \habitual violator\ statute construed to include a mens 14 rea element
- K.S.A. 21-3204 limits strict liability crimes to those situations where legislature has clearly indicated an intention to dispense with criminal intent
- K.S.A. 21-3204 limits strict liability crimes to those situations where legislature has clearly indicated an intention to dispense with criminal intent
- when fundamental rights are involved, substantial diligence in attempting to notify is required; when less significant rights are involved, less effort is required
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Davis, Lockett, Wahl
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
55 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. KleypasSupreme Court of Kansas· 2001-12-28· cited 144×
- State v. MarxSupreme Court of Kansas· 2009-09-18· cited 70×
- State v. EnglesSupreme Court of Kansas· 2001-01-26· cited 55×
- State v. McGillSupreme Court of Kansas· 2001-04-20· cited 48×
- State v. ZabrinasSupreme Court of Kansas· 2001-06-01· cited 44×
- State v. GarzaSupreme Court of Kansas· 2012-08-31· cited 36×
- State v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1999-07-09· cited 35×
- State v. GreeverSupreme Court of Kansas· 2008-05-16· cited 31×
- State v. CrowSupreme Court of Kansas· 1999-01-29· cited 27×
- Hong Van Nguyen v. IBP, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1999-01-22· cited 26×
- State v. GraySupreme Court of Kansas· 2001-03-09· cited 26×
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas· 2001-12-14· cited 24×
- State v. DinkelSupreme Court of Kansas· 2021-09-24· cited 19×
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas· 1999-01-22· cited 18×
- State v. MolerSupreme Court of Kansas· 2000-06-02· cited 18×
- State v. GensonSupreme Court of Kansas· 2022-07-29· cited 17×
- State v. CreamerCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2000-01-21· cited 15×
- State v. PollardSupreme Court of Kansas· 2002-04-26· cited 13×
- State v. BarnesSupreme Court of Kansas· 2003-03-07· cited 13×
- State v. SeaburySupreme Court of Kansas· 1999-05-28· cited 12×
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court· 1950-06-05· cited 10,395×
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court· 1978-06-29· cited 1,267×
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1997-03-07· cited 78×
- State v. RoderickSupreme Court of Kansas· 1996-01-26· cited 72×
- State v. ButtreyOregon Supreme Court· 1982-10-05· cited 69×
- State v. McCallumCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1991-01-02· cited 61×
- State v. KeihnIndiana Supreme Court· 1989-08-10· cited 59×
- State v. MerrifieldSupreme Court of Kansas· 1956-11-03· cited 46×
- State v. MountjoySupreme Court of Kansas· 1995-03-10· cited 38×
- Reed v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1992-12-15· cited 35×
- State v. JC Sports Bar, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1993-10-29· cited 29×
- State v. LoganSupreme Court of Kansas· 1967-03-04· cited 26×
- State Ex Rel. Smith v. Fairmont Foods Co.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1966-01-22· cited 23×
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Kansas· 1982-05-08· cited 23×
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1986-05-02· cited 19×
- State v. HeironimusSupreme Court of Kansas· 1997-07-11· cited 19×
- State v. GrotzkyNebraska Supreme Court· 1986-02-21· cited 19×
- Jeffcoat v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1982-01-07· cited 16×
- State v. ProffittSupreme Court of Kansas· 1997-01-24· cited 10×
- State v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1997-04-11· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.