Skip to main content

State v. Huff

Citations

  • 92 P.3d 604
  • 278 Kan. 214
  • 2004 Kan. LEXIS 410

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding appellate courts only obtain jurisdiction over rulings identified in the notice of appeal
  • affirming judge’s sua sponte dismissal of charges after finding “officers’ entry into the apartment unsupported by an articulable suspicion that there was anyone inside”
  • finding no exigent circumstances to search an apartment after a person smelling of marijuana exited the apartment and was arrested, given “[t]he absence of evidence that someone remained inside”
  • refusing to validate a subsequent search that occurred after an improper warrantless entry where there was “nothing in the record to demonstrate that the odor came from the apartment rather than Rogers herself’
  • odor of marijuana emanating from a private residence alone is insufficient to establish probable cause to support a warrantless search of that residence
  • odor of marijuana emanating from a private residence alone is insufficient to establish probable cause to support a warrantless search of that residence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beier

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.