Nebraska Supreme Court· 8/14/1992

State v. Garza

Citations

487 N.W.2d 551
241 Neb. 256
1992 Neb. LEXIS 246

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that a price tag only represents the sum the retailer hopes to obtain, not necessarily the amount a willing buyer would pay
noting that a price tag only represents the sum the retailer hopes to obtain, not necessarily the amount a willing buyer would pay
evidence of market value insufficient where evidence was presented of price asked for property, but no evidence showed that property was actually purchased at that price
admission or exclusion of photographs under Neb. Evid. R. 901 within discretion of trial court
where evidence consisted of price tags, value not adequately proved in shoplifting case
where evidence consisted of price tags, value not adequately proved in shoplifting case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hastings, Boslaugh, White, Caporale, Shanahan, Grant, Fahrnbruch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.