Colorado Court of Appeals· 6/27/1996
People v. Schmidt
Citations
- 928 P.2d 805
- 20 Brief Times Rptr. 1025
- 1996 Colo. App. LEXIS 198
- 1996 WL 350878
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that section 18-4-414 “allows an accused to rebut the presumption of value” by calling a witness “to establish a value other than that specified on the price tag”
- \See-tion 18-4-414 simply obviates the need to subpoena store managers and go through the same colloquy in every case of retail theft.\
- market value of an item is the price at which it probably would have been sold in the regular course of business at the time and place it was stolen
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rothenberg, Taubman, Casebolt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court· 1980-06-25· cited 5,425×
- Kogan v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 1988-05-09· cited 194×
- State v. GarzaNebraska Supreme Court· 1992-08-14· cited 94×
- People v. DementSupreme Court of Colorado· 1983-04-04· cited 87×
- People v. MarquesSupreme Court of Colorado· 1974-03-11· cited 63×
- Maisel v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 1968-06-17· cited 52×
- People v. MathesColorado Court of Appeals· 1985-02-21· cited 29×
- People v. CoddingSupreme Court of Colorado· 1976-06-21· cited 25×
- People v. McCoySupreme Court of Colorado· 1988-11-14· cited 24×
- Norris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1971-10-26· cited 21×
- State v. RainwaterCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1994-08-01· cited 19×
- DeBruce v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1984-08-14· cited 15×
- Lacy v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1983-06-08· cited 14×
- Boone v. StacyE.D. Virginia· 1984-10-18· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.