Norris v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declaring that the fact an item “was displayed for sale over a period of time with a certain price tag upon it is not hearsay, but fact; and is evidence that the tag reflected its retail value”
• evidence of retail price sufficient circumstantial evidence of value, where un-contradicted, to support larceny conviction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Robinson v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1999-06-11· cited 116×
• State v. Garza
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1992-08-14· cited 94×
• State v. Downing
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 2002-11-26· cited 47×
• Stephans v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2011-10-06· cited 32×
• Eldridge v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1985-05-24· cited 20×
• DeBruce v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1984-08-14· cited 15×
• State v. Love
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1985-12-10· cited 14×
• Lacy v. State
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1983-06-08· cited 14×
• City of Albuquerque v. Martinez
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1979-12-18· cited 11×
• State v. Cofer
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2011-05-27· cited 10×
• Boone v. Stacy
  E.D. Virginia· 1984-10-18· cited 6×
• People v. Schmidt
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1996-06-27· cited 5×
• State v. Bridgeforth
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1992-03-31· cited 5×
• State v. Harris
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1980-10-09· cited 1×
• State of Tennessee v. James Bradley Warner
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 2002-03-26
• State of Tennessee v. Toscar C. Carpenter, Sr.
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 2000-10-18
• People v. Portillo
  California Court of Appeal· 2023-05-15