State v. Juhl

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant’s right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure was not violated when, in response to question from police officer as to what he had in his jacket’s pocket, defendant raised his right arm and responded, “‘[C]heck’”
• relevance of offered evidence, otherwise admissible, involves the discretion of a trial court, whose ruling on relevance will be upheld on appeal unless the trial court abused its discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).