Skip to main content

State v. Rodriguez

Citations

  • 8 P.3d 712
  • 269 Kan. 633
  • 2000 Kan. LEXIS 613

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that a dog is personal property pursuant to criminal statutes
  • closing argument not improper simply because of \impassioned . . . oratory\ or \picturesque speech\
  • closing argument not improper simply because of \impassioned . . . oratory\ or \picturesque speech\
  • closing argument not improper simply because of \impassioned . . . oratory\ or \picturesque speech\
  • viewing dog as personal property for purposes of arson conviction in violation of K.S.A. 21-3718[a][1] which requires knowing damage by means of fire \any . . . property in which another person has any interest without the consent of such other person\
  • “The words ‘any interest’ cover more than just a ‘fee simple in terest’ and include, for example, a leaseholder’s interest in real property.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Larson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.