Skip to main content
· 12/3/1985

State v. Van Ruler

Citations

  • 378 N.W.2d 77
  • 1985 Minn. App. LEXIS 4909

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the district court is not required to give reasons when it imposes the presumptive sentence
  • stating that the district court is not required to give reasons when it elects to impose a presumptive sentence
  • stating that, if district court considers reasons to depart but elects to impose the presumptive sentence, no explanation for denying departure is required
  • “[A]n explanation is not required when the court considers reasons for departure but elects to impose the presumptive sentence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Popovich, Leslie, Nierengarten

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.