New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 5/1/1967
State v. Frost
Citations
- 229 A.2d 673
- 95 N.J. Super. 1
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- legislative purpose revealed by composite thrust of entire statutory scheme in light of legislative history
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judges Conford, Foley and Leonard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Fasching v. KallingerNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1986-05-30· cited 22×
- State v. FerroNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1974-05-16· cited 12×
- State v. DixonNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1987-10-15· cited 5×
- State, in Interest of MsNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1974-05-31· cited 4×
- Bozzuto's Inc. v. KANTROWITZ & SONS, INC.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1971-12-03· cited 4×
- State in Interest of MSNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1976-02-27· cited 1×
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. KoonceNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1965-10-26· cited 77×
- State v. MeinkenSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1952-10-27· cited 77×
- State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1958-11-17· cited 32×
- State v. CongdonNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1962-10-16· cited 23×
- State v. RuckerNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1957-08-16· cited 16×
- State v. HayesNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1958-10-06· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.