State v. Frost
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 3637
Syllabus
The trial court's failure to include the R.C. 2929.14(C)(4) findings in the sentencing entry, after properly making those findings at the sentencing hearing, does not render the sentence contrary to law. However, the cause is remanded to the trial court for the limited purpose of entering a nunc pro tunc entry reflecting the R.C. 2929.14(C)(4) consecutive sentence findings the court made during the sentencing hearing. Judgment affirmed cause remanded with instructions.
Judges: Mentel
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.