State v. Frost
Citations
- 25 Wash. 134
- 64 P. 902
- 1901 Wash. LEXIS 372
Syllabus
<p>TAXATION-SCHOOL LANDS-CANCELLATION OF SALE-EIGHTS OF 6 STATE NOT DIVESTED BY TAX SALE.</p> <p>Under Laws 1893, p. 335, § 26, which provides that “property held under a contract for the purchase thereof, belonging to the state, county or municipality, and school and other state lands, shall be considered, for all purposes of taxation, as the property of the person so holding the same,” only the interest of the contractor for the purchase of state school lands, where the contract of sale has been subsequently canceled for non-payment of installments of purchase price due, can be charged with taxes; and the state’s right to the purchase price, or its right to forfeit the contract for non-payment thereof, cannot be divested by a tax' sale of such lands (Washington Iron Works Co. v. King County, 20 Wash. 150, distinguished).</p>
Judges: Reavis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Olds v. Little Horse Creek Cattle Co.Wyoming Supreme Court· 1914-05-15· cited 18×
- Schofield v. BakerW.D. Washington· 1914-03-15· cited 6×
- Connor v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court· 1917-04-20· cited 5×
- St. Paul & Tacoma Lumber Co. v. StateWashington Supreme Court· 1961-03-09
- Frazier v. WilsonWashington Supreme Court· 1904-09-21
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.