Arizona Supreme Court· 7/28/2008
State v. Anthony
Citations
- 189 P.3d 366
- 218 Ariz. 439
- 2008 Ariz. LEXIS 123
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that the child molestation allegation that was improperly admitted “was not a passing reference, but rather a repeated theme of the State’s closing argument”
- declining to find harmless error when allegation of prior bad act was repeated theme of closing
- stating error is harmless if we can say beyond a reasonable doubt that the error did not contribute to or affect the verdict
- “find[ing] error harmless when the evidence against a defendant is so overwhelming that any reasonable jury could only have reached one conclusion”
- reviewing evidence presented at trial to determine whether clear and convincing evidence supported other act evidence when the trial court admitted evidence based on the parties’ briefs and oral argument
- state has burden to show harmless error, i.e., that beyond a reasonable doubt the error did not contribute to or affect the verdict
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hurwitz, McGregor, Berch, Ryan, Bales
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State of Arizona v. Christopher Mathew PayneArizona Supreme Court· 2013-11-21· cited 304×
- State of Arizona v. Joel Randu Escalante-OrozcoArizona Supreme Court· 2017-01-12· cited 102×
- State v. ValverdeArizona Supreme Court· 2009-06-03· cited 101×
- State v. HargraveArizona Supreme Court· 2010-06-14· cited 65×
- State v. DixonArizona Supreme Court· 2011-05-06· cited 64×
- State v. GarciaArizona Supreme Court· 2010-03-18· cited 54×
- State of Arizona v. Rodney Eugene HardyArizona Supreme Court· 2012-08-16· cited 52×
- State v. FreeneyArizona Supreme Court· 2009-12-04· cited 48×
- State v. GUNCHESArizona Supreme Court· 2010-06-16· cited 39×
- State v. VegaCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2011-11-09· cited 31×
- State v. LynchArizona Supreme Court· 2010-06-22· cited 25×
- State of Arizona v. Jesus Xavier AlmaguerCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2013-05-31· cited 21×
- State of Arizona v. Nelson E. NottinghamCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2012-12-06· cited 16×
- State of Arizona v. Joseph Javier RomeroCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2016-09-13· cited 16×
- State v. Garcia-QuintanaCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2014-03-25· cited 13×
- State v. WallaceArizona Supreme Court· 2008-08-22· cited 11×
- State v. AriasCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2020-03-24· cited 11×
- State of Arizona v. Feliciano Ontiveros-LoyaCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2015-06-30· cited 9×
- State of Arizona v. Anthony DuranArizona Supreme Court· 2013-11-07· cited 8×
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2017-03-13· cited 6×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 2002-06-24· cited 4,683×
- Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1993-06-01· cited 3,512×
- State v. HendersonArizona Supreme Court· 2005-07-08· cited 1,009×
- State v. BibleArizona Supreme Court· 1993-08-12· cited 658×
- State v. ChappleArizona Supreme Court· 1983-01-11· cited 423×
- State v. BoltonArizona Supreme Court· 1995-06-13· cited 326×
- State v. RingArizona Supreme Court· 2003-04-03· cited 325×
- State v. GulbrandsonArizona Supreme Court· 1995-11-02· cited 189×
- State v. TuckerArizona Supreme Court· 2003-05-05· cited 101×
- State v. TerrazasArizona Supreme Court· 1997-08-14· cited 96×
- State v. IvesArizona Supreme Court· 1996-11-07· cited 63×
- State v. SansingArizona Supreme Court· 2003-09-24· cited 54×
- State v. BurtonArizona Supreme Court· 1985-03-26· cited 47×
- State v. TaylorArizona Supreme Court· 1991-09-17· cited 37×
- State v. VigilCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1999-02-02· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.