Court of Appeals of Arizona· 6/25/2020

State v. MacIas

Citations

249 Ariz. 335
469 P.3d 472

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

discussing “how difficult it is to obtain a [post-verdict] reversal” based on premature jury deliberations
affirming denial of post-conviction relief where defendant offered affidavits of two jurors describing other jurors’ premature deliberations but offered no evidence of external influence
“Appellate counsel did not render ineffective assistance by selecting more viable issues to press on appeal.”
“We review for an abuse of discretion the superior court’s denial of post-conviction relief based on lack of a colorable claim.”
“[J]urors in a 6 STATE v. NASH Decision of the Court criminal case are not to discuss trial evidence amongst themselves until the conclusion of evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

49 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.