Jones v. Cunningham

• Article

• Talk

Jones v. Cunningham, 371 U.S. 236 (1963), was a Supreme Court case in which the court first ruled that state inmates had the right to file a writ of habeas corpus challenging both the legality and the conditions of their imprisonment.[1] Prior to this, starting with _Pervear v. Massachusetts _, 72 U.S. 475 (1866),[2] the court had maintained a "hands off" policy regarding federal interference with state incarceration policies and practices, maintaining that the Bill of Rights did not apply to the states.[3] Subsequently, in _Cooper v. Pate _ (1964),[4] an inmate successfully obtained standing to challenge the denial of his right to practice his religion through a habeas corpus writ.

English Wikisource has original text related to this article:

**Jones v. Cunningham **

References

(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jones_v._Cunningham&action=edit&section=1 "Edit section: References")

1. ↑ Jones v. Cunningham, 371 U.S. 236 (1963).
2. ↑ _Pervear v. Massachusetts _, 72 U.S. 475 (1866).
3. ↑ "Constitutional Topic: The Bill of Rights" . U.S. Constitution Online. Retrieved December 10, 2007.
4. ↑ _Cooper v. Pate _, 378 U.S. 546 (1964).

Further reading

(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jones_v._Cunningham&action=edit&section=2 "Edit section: Further reading")

• Gertmenian, Alfred (1963). "Criminal Procedure: The Custody Requirement for Habeas Corpus Relief in the Federal Courts". _California Law Review _. 51 (1): 228–232. doi :10.2307/3478912 . JSTOR  3478912 .

External links

(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jones_v._Cunningham&action=edit&section=3 "Edit section: External links")

• Text of Jones v. Cunningham, 371 U.S. 236 (1963) is available from: CourtListener Findlaw Google Scholar Internet Archive (docket files) Justia Library of Congress Oyez (oral argument audio)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jones_v._Cunningham&oldid=1351342132 "