Supreme Court of South Carolina· 8/5/1991
Huckaby v. State
Citations
- 408 S.E.2d 242
- 305 S.C. 331
- 1991 S.C. LEXIS 161
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing constitutional rights are available to probationer
- “all persons charged with probation violations must be advised of their right to counsel”
- \all persons charged with probation violations must be advised of their right to counsel\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Toal, Gregory, Harwell, Chandler, Finny
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 11,585×
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court· 1973-05-14· cited 5,755×
- Wroten v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1990-04-30· cited 30×
- Barlet v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1986-05-05· cited 21×
- State v. FranksSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-08-11· cited 14×
- State v. BatemanSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1988-10-31· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.