State v. Aguilar

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that proba- ble cause, rather than merely reasonable suspicion, is required to make a stop for a traffic violation
• explaining that proba- ble cause, rather than merely reasonable suspicion, is required to make a stop for a traffic violation
• “training and experience is not, in and of itself, a spe- cific and articulable fact” that can provide sufficient proof of reasonable suspicion (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “[A]n officer may con- sider the facts in light of the officer’s training, knowledge, and experience, but that experience cannot itself supply the facts.”
• “Officer experience might explain legal 2 Article I, section 9, provides, in part: “No law shall violate the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unrea- sonable search, or seizure[.]” Cite as 314 Or App 172 (2021

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Cazee
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-01-27· cited 12×
• State v. T. T.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-01-06· cited 10×
• State v. Bowen
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-01-13· cited 9×
• State v. Roberts
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-12-30· cited 7×
• State v. Bradley
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-12-28· cited 7×
• State v. Sullivan
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-11-02· cited 4×
• State v. Lebanno
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-09-01· cited 1×
• State v. Layton
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-11-13· cited 1×
• State v. Ritter
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-09-01

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• State v. Bivins
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-01-21· cited 172×
• State v. Maciel-Figueroa
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2017-03-02· cited 137×
• State v. Unger
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2014-08-28· cited 113×
• Huffman v. Alexander
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1952-12-06· cited 82×
• State v. Arreola-Botello
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2019-11-15· cited 82×
• State v. Pitt
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2012-10-18· cited 80×
• State v. Holdorf
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2014-08-07· cited 75×
• State v. Painter
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1984-02-15· cited 71×
• State v. Ratliff
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1987-10-20· cited 56×
• State v. Thompkin
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2006-09-14· cited 54×
• State v. Vasquez-Villagomez
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2009-02-26· cited 41×
• State v. Tiffin
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-10-12· cited 32×
• State v. Rodriguez-Perez
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-04-09· cited 29×
• State v. Jackson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-02-14· cited 27×
• State v. Foster
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2011-04-07· cited 25×
• State v. Maciel
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-01-16· cited 25×
• State v. Ratliff
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-11-19· cited 15×
• State v. Farrar
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-09-12· cited 13×
• State v. Sunderman
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-05-20· cited 10×
• State v. Keys
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-02-26· cited 8×