Skip to main content

State v. Anderson

Citations

  • 687 S.E.2d 35
  • 386 S.C. 120
  • 2009 S.C. LEXIS 563

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding the State adequately authenticated a ten-print card under Rule 901(b)(7) by eliciting testimony that law enforcement collects fingerprints from every arrested person in this state and SLED stores and maintains the prints in AFIS
  • noting, even though evidence may generally be considered not to violate the prohibition against various rules of evidence, \the proponent of the evidence must still comply with authentication requirements\ in order for it to be admissible
  • the State properly authenticated the ten-print card under Rule 901(b)(7) as a business record and under 901(b)(9

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beatty, Toal, Waller, Pleicones, Moore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.