Supreme Court of South Carolina· 12/21/2009
State v. Anderson
Citations
- 687 S.E.2d 35
- 386 S.C. 120
- 2009 S.C. LEXIS 563
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding the State adequately authenticated a ten-print card under Rule 901(b)(7) by eliciting testimony that law enforcement collects fingerprints from every arrested person in this state and SLED stores and maintains the prints in AFIS
- noting, even though evidence may generally be considered not to violate the prohibition against various rules of evidence, \the proponent of the evidence must still comply with authentication requirements\ in order for it to be admissible
- the State properly authenticated the ten-print card under Rule 901(b)(7) as a business record and under 901(b)(9
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Beatty, Toal, Waller, Pleicones, Moore
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In Re Tracy B.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2010-12-20· cited 13×
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2018-08-29· cited 13×
- State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2014-02-12· cited 9×
- State v. LawsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2018-06-06· cited 1×
- State v. HeywardCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2020-10-07
- Grimes v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2021-06-24
- Pierce v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2022-01-04
- State v. BrayboyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2012-12-12
- State v. HeywardSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2023-10-05
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
- State v. PaganSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2006-06-19· cited 319×
- United States v. LauderTenth Circuit· 2005-06-08· cited 80×
- State v. DuBrayMontana Supreme Court· 2003-09-23· cited 50×
- State v. CribbSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1992-12-14· cited 34×
- United States v. William Lee PattersonFourth Circuit· 2002-01-18· cited 21×
- State v. ForemanSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-09-16· cited 21×
- State v. RichSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1987-08-03· cited 13×
- State v. LeeLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1991-04-03· cited 11×
- State v. CarruthMissouri Court of Appeals· 2005-07-05· cited 6×
- State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-05-06· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.