Supreme Court of Connecticut· 3/13/2007

State v. Canales

Citations

916 A.2d 767
281 Conn. 572
2007 Conn. LEXIS 91

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

declining to find due process violation for judge's failure to recuse where defendant claimed no actual bias
declining to find due process violation for judge’s failure to recuse where defendant claimed no actual bias
rejecting defendant’s argument that police officer was required to “indicate explicitly that the interview was over”
declining Golding review where neither probable cause nor legality of arrest were subject of “meaningful discussion” at suppression hearing
addressing state constitutional claim, even though defendant did not invoke Geisler factors, because defendant’s presentation of her constitu- tional claim was ‘‘sufficiently clear and thorough as to constitute a function- ally adequate Geisler analysis’’
record inadequate because “the court was not provided with evidence upon which it could make a probable cause determination”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Borden, Norcott, Katz, Palmer, Vertefeuille

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

55 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Canales

16 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.