Skip to main content

State v. Ford

Citations

  • 2021 Ohio 3058

Syllabus

Allowing jury to view body camera footage of victim implicating the defendant, despite victim's absence at trial, was not reversible error because the victim's comments were non-testimonial in nature and therefore did not violate the Confrontation Clause of the U.S. Constitution and because comments fell within exceptions to the hearsay rule. Also, the defendant's felony convictions were supported by sufficient evidence and were not against the manifest weight of the evidence.

Judges: Mayle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.