Skip to main content

State v. Wallace

Citations

  • 2024 Ohio 2201

Syllabus

Per Mayle, J., the trial court violated appellant's confrontation rights by allowing the detective to testify to statements that the victim made to him. The error is not harmless beyond a reasonable doubt because there is not overwhelming evidence of appellant's guilt or some other indication that the improper evidence did not impact the verdict. When all of the evidence admitted at trial is considered, appellant's conviction is supported by sufficient evidence.

Judges: Mayle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.